Which of the following is NOT a component that a plaintiff must prove for negligence?

In negligence cases, a plaintiff must establish several key components to prove their case. One of these is the existence of duty, which refers to the obligation of the defendant to act in a manner that does not cause harm to the plaintiff. Conduct is also essential, as it pertains to the actions taken (or not taken) by the defendant that allegedly resulted in harm. Causation involves demonstrating that the defendant's conduct directly caused the injury or damage suffered by the plaintiff.

The presence of intent, however, is not a necessary component in negligence claims. Negligence focuses on a failure to exercise a reasonable standard of care rather than on the intention behind the actions. In contrast, intentional torts require proof of intent, which distinguishes them from negligence as a legal theory. Therefore, it is accurate to state that the presence of intent is not required for a plaintiff to establish a claim of negligence.