Which imaging technique is considered more accurate than arthrography but also more invasive?

Arthroscopy is considered more accurate than arthrography due to its ability to provide direct visualization of joint structures, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of intra-articular pathology. This technique involves inserting a small camera into the joint space, which enables the clinician to see and evaluate any damage or abnormalities that may not be detectable with less invasive methods like arthrography.

While arthrography provides valuable insights through the use of contrast material to highlight joint spaces, it is limited in its ability to offer a real-time, direct view of the tissue. In contrast, arthroscopy allows for not only diagnosis but also potential therapeutic interventions, such as repairing torn ligaments or removing loose bodies, during the same procedure.

The increased invasiveness of arthroscopy is a trade-off for its high accuracy and the added benefit of treatment capability, making it a crucial tool in the field of athletic training and sports medicine when a detailed assessment and intervention are needed.