Which factor is NOT accounted for in comparative negligence?

In comparative negligence, various factors are taken into account to assess the liability of each party involved in an incident. The primary focus is on the actions and decisions of the plaintiff and the defendant, as well as any inherent risks associated with the activity in question.

When considering the correct answer, it is understood that the number of witnesses present does not play a role in evaluating comparative negligence. Instead, the process centers around how much each party contributed to the negligence that led to the harm or injury. This includes factors such as the plaintiff's decision to participate in a risky activity and the defendant's actions that may have contributed to the incident. Inherent risks are also considered because they relate to the nature of the activity engaged in.

Therefore, the presence of witnesses may provide testimonies or evidence, but it is not a determining factor in the comparative negligence assessment. The focus remains on the actions of both parties and the risks involved, which makes the correct answer clear.