Which ethical principle is most likely to be followed by Athletic Trainers who feel a strong professional duty?

The ethical principle of formalism is grounded in the belief that professionals have a duty to adhere to established rules and guidelines. For athletic trainers, who operate in environments where ethical standards are critical for ensuring the safety and well-being of athletes, formalism emphasizes a commitment to these ethical duties and the integrity of the profession. This principle is characterized by its focus on the importance of following set procedures and protocols, reflecting a strong sense of responsibility and adherence to professional ethics.

Athletic trainers guided by formalism prioritize the professional codes of conduct that delineate their responsibilities, ensuring that their decisions are made with adherence to ethical norms, irrespective of the consequences. This principle is particularly relevant in athletic training, where the potential implications of decisions can significantly impact an athlete's health and performance.

In contrast, other ethical principles like utilitarianism focus on the outcomes of actions, which might lead to justifying actions that undermine professional duties for the sake of broader benefits. Situational ethics emphasizes context over established rules, potentially leading to inconsistency in decision-making. Pragmatism, while practical and adaptable, may prioritize results over adherence to formal professional standards, which can risk undermining the foundational ethical commitments that athletic trainers uphold.

By adhering to formalism, athletic trainers demonstrate their dedication